The President Chickens Out on Spending Cuts

At a time when our deficit is $1,600,000,000,000.00
 (and our debt is  14 Trillion),
we need to propose a budget which actually balances the books, not one that is the same as last year, which is already over 30% more than the 2008-2009 budget, and that's not even including the Trillion dollar stimulus boondoggle.. Let's go back to that budget, and perhaps we would be closer to balance.

The President Chickens Out on Spending Cuts February 14, 2011 2:16 P.M. By Chris Edwards Despite the record $1.6 trillion deficit this year, and the consensus that exploding spending and debt is pushing the nation toward catastrophe, the Obama administration has completely chickened out on spending reforms in its new budget. Even though Obama's own Fiscal Commission proposed many good spending-cut ideas, the new Obama budget takes a complete pass. The budget has 2012 spending falling a bit from record 2011 levels, but that's because "stimulus" spending is winding down, war costs are supposed to fall, and unemployment benefits should decline as the economy improves. Let's look at some of the new budget data (all data for fiscal years): ● Total federal spending jumped from $2.98 trillion in 2008 to $3.82 trillion in 2011. Obama's budget has outlays at $3.73 trillion in 2012, but that's still up 25 percent from 2008. Spending in 2011 is the highest share of GDP since WWII at 25.3 percent. ● Non-defense discretionary spending jumped from $522 billion in 2008 to $655 billion in 2011. Spending is supposed to fall to $611 billion in 2012, but that's still up 17 percent from 2008.  ● Defense spending jumped from $612 billion in 2008 to $761 billion in 2011. Spending is supposed to fall to $730 billion in 2012, but that's still up 19 percent from 2008. ● Entitlement spending jumped from $1.59 trillion in 2008 to $2.19 trillion in 2011. The budget has entitlement spending at $2.14 trillion in 2012, which is up a huge 35 percent from 2008.      Obama took a "shellacking" in the November elections as a result of his big-government policies. Does his new budget reflect any movement to the fiscal center? Not at all — spending levels in his new budget are virtually the same as in last year's budget. ● Last year, Obama proposed total spending for 2012 of $3.76 trillion. His new budget proposes 2012 spending of $3.73 trillion. So, in response to huge and growing concerns about overspending in Washington, the administration has essentially not changed next year's spending target at all. ● Last year, Obama projected spending in 2020 at $5.71 trillion. His new budget has spending in 2020 at $5.42 trillion. So the new focus on fiscal restraint in Washington has convinced the administration to trim just 5 percent off of its previous budget by the end of the decade. The new proposal for spending in 2020 is 42 percent higher than spending this year. ● Last year, Obama's budget showed public debt rising to 77 percent of GDP by 2020. Yet despite all the administration's expressed concern about rising debt, the new budget has exactly the same debt target in 2020 of 77 percent. ● Last year, Obama proposed 2012 discretionary outlays of $1.30 trillion. This year, Obama proposed 2012 discretionary outlays of $1.34 trillion. In the administration's mind, apparently absolutely nothing has changed on fiscal policy in the last year. Obama hasn't shifted toward fiscal responsibility an inch. The Tea Party movement, the November elections, the government debt crises in Europe, and the Obama Fiscal Commission have all been totally ignored in the new federal budget. — Chris Edwards is editor of the Cato Institute's DownsizingGovernment.org.